流体机械

2020, v.48;No.578(08) 53-58

[打印本页] [关闭]
本期目录(Current Issue) | 过刊浏览(Archive) | 高级检索(Advanced Search)

3种除湿方式的对比试验研究
Comparative Experimental Study on Three Dehumidification Processes

马雪健,郭春梅,李胜英,孟丹东,董思航
Ma Xuejian,Guo Chunmei,Li Shengying,Meng Dandong,Dong Sihang

摘要(Abstract):

提出了一种基于间接蒸发冷却内冷式液体除湿器(IPHE),并与绝热除湿器(APHE)的性能进行了比较。为了提高除湿性能,采用纳米二氧化钛改变内冷除湿器(WPHE)的润湿面积,之后比较分析了3种除湿方式中一次空气含湿量、流量和温度对除湿性能的影响。结果表明,与间接蒸发冷却内冷式液体除湿器(IPHE)相比,当分别改变一次空气含湿量、流量和温度时,绝热除湿器(APHE)的除湿量?M、板换效率e和传质系数h_p较早达到除湿极限。此外,与间接蒸发冷却内冷式液体除湿器(IPHE)相比,改变润湿面积后的内冷除湿器(WPHE)的除湿量?M、板换效率e和传质系数h_p分别提高了7%~20%,80%~120%和25%~52%。
An internally cooled liquid dehumidifier(IPHE) based on indirect evaporative cooling was proposed and was compared with the adiabatic dehumidifier(APHE).In order to improve the dehumidification performance,nano-titanium dioxide was used to change the wetting area of the dehumidifier(WPHE).Then the effects of primary air moisture content,flow rate and temperature on dehumidification performance were analyzed and compared among the three types of dehumidification.The results show that compared with IPHE,when the primary air moisture content,flow rate and temperature were changed respectively,the dehumidification capacity ?M,plate exchange efficiency e and mass transfer coefficient h_p of APHE reached the dehumidification limit earlier than those of IPHE.In addition,compared with IPHE,the dehumidification amount ?M,plate exchange efficiency e and mass transfer coefficient of WPHE after changing the wetting area were increased by 7%~20%,80%~120% and 25%~52%,respectively.

关键词(KeyWords): 内冷式除湿器;除湿性能;超亲水材料;试验
internally cooled dehumidifier;dehumidification performance;super hydrophilic material;experiment

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(51678385);; 天津地区公共机构绿色运营关键技术开发项目(18YFZCSF01390)

作者(Author): 马雪健,郭春梅,李胜英,孟丹东,董思航
Ma Xuejian,Guo Chunmei,Li Shengying,Meng Dandong,Dong Sihang

参考文献(References):

扩展功能
本文信息
服务与反馈
本文关键词相关文章
本文作者相关文章
中国知网
分享